Talk:Nations: Difference between revisions
From Terra Invicta Official Wiki
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* 1 + priority bonus (from hab modules, orgs, techs, etc) | * 1 + priority bonus (from hab modules, orgs, techs, etc) | ||
- [[User:Anti|Anti]] ([[User talk:Anti|talk]]) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC-6) | - [[User:Anti|Anti]] ([[User talk:Anti|talk]]) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC-6) | ||
== is propaganda calculation wrong? == | |||
in the propaganda section it says there is a 10/X percent chance to move the group, where X is the propaganda strength. It doesn't make sense that the chance to move would be an inverse relationship to propaganda strength. | |||
: It is correct. It has an inverse relationship because failing this chance makes the group move by *two* units instead of one. [[User:76561199014279152|76561199014279152]] ([[User talk:76561199014279152|talk]]) 19:40, 23 November 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:40, 23 November 2025
I want to add this but it is blocking me (spam?).
The "cost against cap" to hold each control point is equal to the monthly investment points of the nation.
- Nice find, I've added it to the control points section :) Kami-sama (talk) 10:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
---
Not sure exactly how to word this for the page, but we did some rough math in #ti-players-helping-players and came up with the math for Direct Investment. Based on someone decompiling the binary, and like 15 minutes of testing, here's what we have:
- 300 base cost
- 150 for each owned CP by your faction
- 300 for each uncontrolled CP
- 450 for each CP controlled by a different faction
Multiplied by
- 1 + corruption (spoils requirement %)
Divided by
- 1 + direct investment reduction (mostly from techs)
- 1 + priority bonus (from hab modules, orgs, techs, etc)
- Anti (talk) 19:37, 12 November 2022 (UTC-6)
is propaganda calculation wrong?
in the propaganda section it says there is a 10/X percent chance to move the group, where X is the propaganda strength. It doesn't make sense that the chance to move would be an inverse relationship to propaganda strength.


